Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 103973 (ALL)

SMT HEERAWATI v. State of U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIC/34126/2024 · 2025-02-24

Manish Kumar Nigam

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:26906 Court No. - 34 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 34126 of 2024 Petitioner :- Smt Heerawati Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Kripa Shankar Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Manish Kumar Nigam,J. 1. Heard learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents and perused the record. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed for the following relief: "i) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus and direct to respondent no.2 i.e. Tehsldar, Judicial, Budhanpur, District Azamgarh to decide the restoration application dated 22.3.2024 filed in Case No.RST/4436/2023 Computer Case No. T202315060604436 (Israwati Vs. Kawal @ Kewali) u/s 34/35 U.P. Revenue Code, expeditiously within any stipulated period as this Hon'ble court may deem fit and proper in circumstances of case." 3. By order dated 05.12.2024, a report was called by Tehsildar, Judicial, Budhanpur, District- Azamgarh as to why the restoration application was not decided. In compliance of the order dated 05.12.2024, a report has been submitted by Tehsildar dated 11.12.2024, wherein it has been stated that restoration application has been decided on 22.03.2024 and the delay in disposal of the application was due to lawyers' strike. 4. Since the restoration application filed by the petitioner has already been decided, no further orders are required to be passed in the writ petition. 5. In case, the petitioner is aggrieved by the order, he will be at liberty to challenge the same in an appropriate proceedings. 6. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 25.2.2025 Nitika Sri. (Manish Kumar Nigam, J.) Digitally signed by :- NITIKA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad