Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10397 (UTT)

LUXMI DEVI AND ORS v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/934/2024 · 2025-04-09

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPCRL No.934 of 2024 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners. 2. Mr. S.S. Chauhan, learned Deputy Advocate General for the State. 3. It is contended by learned Counsel for the petitioners that the present matter has rendered infructuous since all the petitioners have been granted anticipatory bail by the Sessions Court. 4. In view of the aforesaid statement, present petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. (Pankaj Purohit J.) 09.04.2025 Ravi