Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10396 (UTT)

KAKKA SINGH ALIAS KAKKI v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/1929/2021 · 2025-03-26

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPCRL No.1929 of 2021 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Ms. Sarita Bisht, Advocate for the petitioners. 2. Mr. B.C. Joshi, A.G.A. with Ms. S.B. Dobhal, B.H. for the State. 3. Mr. Anand Singh, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Amar Murti Shukla, Advocate for respondent no2. 4. Learned counsel for the State made a statement at bar that the writ petition has rendered infructuous, as charge sheet has been submitted in the matter on 02.09.2022, which is not disputed by learned counsel for the petitioners. 5. In view of the statement so made by learned counsel for the State, nothing remains to be decided in the present writ petition. 6. Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed as infructuous with a liberty to the petitioners to challenge the charge sheet before appropriate forum. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 26.03.2025 SK