HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 34489 of 2025 Court No. - 69 HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR SINGH DESHWAL, J. 1. Heard Ms. Haya Rizvi learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. Instant bail application has been filed with a prayer to release the applicant on bail during the trial in Case Crime No. 169 of 2025, under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 109(1), 351(3) of the BNS, Police Station- Charthawal, District Muzaffarnagar. 3. Contention of learned counsel for the applicant is that in the FIR as well as the statement of victim the general role has been assigned to all the accused persons and co-accused Ajay and Vikrant having similar role to that of applicant have been enlarged on bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.28704 of 2025 vide order dated 11.09.2025 and Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 30948 of 2025 vide order dated 17.09.2025 respectively. Therefore, he is seeking parity of the orders aforesaid. He argued that charge sheet has been filed on 18.09.2025 by the police, therefore, there is no requirement for custodial interrogation. The applicant has no criminal history and he is languishing in jail since 07.08.2025. In case, he is granted bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and would cooperate in the trial proceedings. 4. Per contra, learned A.G.A. for the State opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the aforesaid facts. 5. Thus, considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case, submissions of learned counsel for the parties and co-accused Ajay and Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Haya Rizvi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Shivam @ Shivom Singh .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) Vikrant having similar role to that of applicant have been enlarged on bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.28704 of 2025 vide order dated 11.09.2025 and Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 30948 of 2025 vide order dated 17.09.2025 respectively and keeping in view the nature of offence, evidence, complicity of accused and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I am of the opinion that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail. 6. Let the applicant- Shivam @ Shivom Singh involved in the aforementioned crime be released on bail, on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned, with the following conditions:- i. The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. ii. The applicant shall cooperate in the trial/investigation sincerely without seeking any adjournment. iii. The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail. iv. The applicant shall attend in accordance with the conditions of the bond executed by him. 7. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail. 8. Identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted. October 7, 2025 Imtiyaz BAIL No. 34489 of 2025 2 (Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal,J.) Digitally signed by :- IMTIYAZ AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad