BAHIDULLAH KHAN @ MOHD BADAL v. STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS
WRIC/35352/2025 · 2025-10-07
Kunal Ravi Singh, Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 103932 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 103932 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 35352 of 2025 Court No. - 29 HON'BLE MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, J.
HON'BLE KUNAL RAVI SINGH, J.
1. Heard Sri Satish Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Akash Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no.2-NHAI and Sri Devesh Vikram, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for State-respondents. 2. The instant writ petition has been preferred praying inter alia for the following relief:
"1. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent authorities to grant adequate compensation amount in favour of the petitioner through acquisition of petitioner's land i.e. Arazi No.1M area 0.1217, Arazi No. 2M area 0.0566 total area 0.1783 situated at Gram Vishunpur Hasilpur, Tehsil Chhibramau, District-Kannauj. 2. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent no.4 to decide the representation of the petitioner dated 15.05.2025 within stipulated time frame period as may be determined by this Hon'ble Court under the facts and circumstances."
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in spite of all the documents furnished qua release of the compenstation to his own share, till date the Competent Authority has not processed such application and actual disbursement has not been ensured and in such situation, the petitioner is compelled to file the instant petition. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anil Kumar, Satish Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Dinesh Kumar Singh Bahidullah Khan @ Mohd Badal .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s)
4. Considering the relief as has been prayed for, no useful purpose would be served to invite the counter affidavit in the instant matter. As the land has been acquired by the Central Government for national highway, and it is also reflected from the record that adequate compensation has also been prepared but on account of certain rights, viz-a-viz between family members, actual disbursement has not been made. 5. Therefore, at this stage with the consent of the parties considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the relief prayed in the instant matter, we dispose of the instant petition with a direction to the Special Land Acquisition Officer (for short 'S.L.A.O.')/Prescribed Authority- respondent no.3 to process the application of the petitioner in accordance with law within two month from the date of production of certified copy of this order.
October 8, 2025 Sumit S WRIC No. 35352 of 2025 2 (Kunal Ravi Singh,J.) (Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.) Digitally signed by :- SUMIT SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad