Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10393 (GAU)

ABDUL MALEK @ ABDUL MALEQUE v. BORSING RONGPI AND 2 ORS

Cont.Cas(C)/202/2023 · 2025-07-29

Devashis Baruah

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010072732023 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/202/2023 ABDUL MALEK @ ABDUL MALEQUE S/O LT. A. SATTAR, R/O BORIGAON, P.O.-DANDUA, P.S.-MORIGAON, DIST- MORIGAON, ASSAM, PIN-782104 VERSUS BORSING RONGPI AND 2 ORS CHIEF ENGINEER, WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, BASISTHA, GUWAHATI, ASSAM, ASSAM WATER CENTRE, GUWAHATI-781029 2:JAGADIPAN DEY THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT NOGAON CIRCLE DIST-NAGAON ASSAM PIN-782001 3:LOCHAN CHOUDHURY EXECUTIVE ENGINEER WATER RESOURCE DEPARTMENT MORIGAON WATER RESOURCE DIVISION MORIGAON P.O. AND DIST-MORIGAON ASSAM PIN-78210 For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. R. A. Ahmed, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : Ms. R. Deka, Standing Counsel Page No.# 2/2 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH ORDER Date : 30.07.2025 It has been submitted by Mr. R. A. Ahmed, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner herein had expired. Under such circumstances, the legal representatives of the petitioner have not approached him seeking substitution. The learned counsel further submits that it is under such circumstances, the impleadment application could not be filed. 2. This Court duly takes note of that without impleading the present incumbent(s), it would not be possible to proceed with the contempt proceedings. Accordingly, this Court drops the instant contempt application however grants liberty to the legal representatives of the deceased petitioner to file separate contempt application, if so advised. JUDGE Comparing Assistant