Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 103928 (ALL)

SAMUJH v. State of UP AND 3 OTHERS

WRIC/34086/2024 · 2025-02-13

Manish Kumar Nigam

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:20951 Court No. - 34 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 34086 of 2024 Petitioner :- Samujh Respondent :- State Of Up And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rishikesh Kumar Maurya,Sunil Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- Bhupendra Kumar Tripathi,C.S.C. Hon'ble Manish Kumar Nigam,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed for the following relief: "i) To quash the impugned order dated 08.11.2023 passed by Assistant Collector First Class/ Tehsildar (Judicial) Sadar, Jaunpur/ Respondent No.3 in Case No. 1986 of 2023, Computerized Case No. T202314360401986 Under Section-67 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 whereby Eviction and Compensation of Rs. 5250/- has been passed against the petitioner with regard to Arazi No. 356 area 0.005 hectare out of 2.450 hectare situated at Village- Meerpur, Pachewara, Pargana-Saremu, Tehsil-Sadar, District Jaunpur." 3. Learned Standing Counsel has raised preliminary objection that order impugned has been passed under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 against which the petitioner has alternative remedy of filing an appeal and in case, the order is ex-parte, the petitioner has remedy of filing a restoration application. 4. In view of the availability of alternative remedy, I am not inclined to interfere in the matter. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to avail the remedy as available to him under law. Order Date :- 13.2.2025 Nitika Sri. (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- NITIKA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad