Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10390 (UTT)

VIKASH CHAUHAN v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/1923/2021 · 2025-04-01

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPCRL No.1923 of 2021 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Mohd. Alauddin, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. Mr. S.C. Dumka, learned AGA for the State. 3. Learned State Counsel made a statement at bar that after investigation, final report has been submitted in the matter. 4. In view of the statement made by learned State Counsel, nothing remains to be decided in the present writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 01.04.2025 AK