Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:63935 Court No. - 86 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 38082 of 2024 Applicant :- Salman Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Mohit Kumar Baisla,Vivek Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Rahul Chaudhary Hon'ble Dr. Gautam Chowdhary,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State as well as learned counsel for the informant and perused the material brought on record. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant has argued that the F.I.R. was lodged against the applicant and one co-accused with the allegation that the applicant is the collection agent, after collecting cash of installments from the investors the applicant had not deposited in the company and embezzled Rs. 3,50,557/-. Learned counsel further submits that false allegation has been made against the applicant that he had not deposited the installments in the company though he took money from the investors. There is no documentary evidence of such cheating committed by the applicant as none of the investors has been made witness in the charge sheet, which would be relevant to prove the case against the applicant. Therefore, applicant has been falsely implicated due to ulterior motive and he may be enlarged on bail. Several other submissions in order to demonstrate the falsity of the allegations made against the applicant have also been placed before the Court. The circumstances which, according to the counsel, led to the false implication of the accused have also been mentioned. It has also been assured on behalf of the applicant that he is ready to cooperate with the process of law and shall faithfully make himself available before the court whenever required and is also ready to accept all the conditions which the Court may deem fit to impose upon him. He next submits that the applicant is in jail since 03.07.2024, with no criminal history. 3. Though, the learned A.GA. for the State as well as learned counsel for the informant have opposed the prayer for bail but they could not dispute the above submissions made on behalf of applicant. 4. Considering the overall facts and circumstances, the nature of allegations, the gravity of offence and without expressing any opinion on merits, this Court finds it to be a fit case for bail. Accordingly, the bail application stands allowed. 5. Let the applicant-Salman, be enlarged on bail in Case Crime No. 23 of 2023, under Sections 420, 406, 409 I.P.C., Police Station- Medical, District- Meerut, on executing a personal bond and furnishing two local sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: i) The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence. ii) The applicant shall not threaten or harass the prosecution witnesses. iii) The applicant shall appear on the date fixed by the trial court. iv) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which the applicant is accused, or suspected of the commission. v) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade such person from disclosing facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. 6. In case of default of any of the conditions enumerated above, the court concerned shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of applicant in accordance with law. Order Date :- 24.4.2025 Mustaqeem. Digitally signed by :- MOHD MUSTAQEEM KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad