Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10389 (UTT)

SUBHASH SINGH v. NAGAR NIGAM HARIDWAR THROUGH ITS MUKHYA NAGAR ADHIKARI

WPMS/2125/2022 · 2025-08-14

Manoj Kumar Tiwari

Civil Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPMS/2125/2022 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J 1. Mr. Ajay Joshi, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. Ms. Ruchika Negi, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Sandeep Kothari, learned counsel for respondent no. 1. 2. Mr. S.K. Nainwal, learned Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand. 3. Mr. Lalit Samant, learned counsel for respondent no. 4. 4. As per letter dated 18.07.2025, received from 4th Additional District & Sessions Judge, Haridwar, Civil Appeal No. 59 of 2013 (Amir Singh vs Nagar Nigam, Haridwar & others) was decided on 03.05.2024. 5. Since petitioner has challenged an interlocutory order passed in the said appeal, therefore, after decision in the suit, the relief, as claimed in the writ petition, do not survive. 6. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed, as infructuous. (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J) 14.08.2025 Aswal NITI RAJ SINGH ASWAL Digitally signed by NITI RAJ SINGH ASWAL DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=eacc6757ee7881e933ff8934f07477 005aa85f9802a3a08b08d1369512ea30f3, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=44EB54CBF00B7698CB6F10C 2CE3D26F5C22DACF4F4610C1FE58A58531 726FBB0, cn=NITI RAJ SINGH ASWAL Date: 2025.08.14 02:33:59 -07'00'