Crl.O.P.No.25814 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 19.09.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR Crl.O.P.No.25814 of 2025 V.Vignesh ... Petitioner Vs. The State Rep. By, The Inspector of Police, Chetpet Police Station, Tiruvannamalai District. Crime No.302 of 2025 ... Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest in Crime No.302 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner : Mr.SB Viswanathan For Respondent : Mr.S.Udayakumar Government Advocate (Criminal Side) 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.25814 of 2025 O R D E R The petitioner herein apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 303(2) and 326(a) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, read with Section 21(5) of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957, in Crime No.302 of 2025, on the file of the respondent Police, seeks anticipatory bail. 2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with other accused had illegally transported 2 units of river sand. Hence, the case. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and has been falsely implicated in this case. The petitioner is ready and willing to abide by any conditions that may be imposed by this Court hence, he prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 4. Learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police reiterated the prosecution case and opposed the grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.25814 of 2025 5. Heard the learned counsels on either side and perused the materials available on record. 6. Considering the gravity of the offences, and also quantity and place where the sand was illegally quarried, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 7. Accordingly, this criminal original petition stands dismissed. 19.09.2025 cda To 1.The Judicial Magistrate, Polur, Tiruvannamalai. 2.The Inspector of Police, Chetpet Police Station, Tiruvannamalai District. 3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.25814 of 2025 K.RAJASEKAR, J. cda Crl.O.P.No.25814 of 2025 19.09.2025 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis