- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-K:2562-DB RP No. 200015 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, KALABURAGI BENCH DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K NATARAJAN AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL REVIEW PETITION NO. 200015 OF 2025 BETWEEN: SMT. SHILPARANI W/O LATE RAMDAS, AGE: 33 YEARS, OCC: NIL, R/O TADAPALLI VILLAGE, TQ & DIST: BIDAR – 585101. …PETITIONER (BY SRI HULEPPA HEROOR, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, WOMEN AND CHILD DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU – 560001. 2. THE DY. DIRECTOR OF WOMEN & CHILD DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, BIDAR – 585101. 3. THE CHILD DEVELOPMENT & PLANNING OFFICER, TQ: BIDAR, DIST: BIDAR – 585101. 4. THE DY. COMMISSIONER BIDAR DISTRICT, BIDAR – 585101. 5. SMT. PREMALA W/O TUKARAM, AGE: 34 YEARS, ANGANAWADI ASSISTANT, TADAPALLI VILLAGE, TALUK & DIST: BIDAR – 585403. …RESPONDENTS Digitally signed by RAMESH MATHAPATI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-K:2562-DB RP No. 200015 of 2025 THIS REVIEW PETITION FILED UNDER ORDER 47 RULE 1 R/W SECTION 114 OF CPC, PRAYING TO REVIEW THE IMPUGNED JUDGEMENT AND FINAL ORDER DATED 04.03.2025 PASSED BY THIS HONOURABLE COURT IN WA NO. 200116/2023 (S-RES). THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K NATARAJAN AND HON'BLE MR JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) Sri.Huleppa Heroor, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is an error apparent on the record in the impugned order dated 04.03.2025 passed by this Court in W.A.No.200116/2023. It is submitted that this Court has recorded the finding that the appellant has filed objections with regard to the residential certificate of the review petitioner. However, no such objections were filed. 2. We have heard the arguments and perused the material available on record. We do not find any error apparent on the face of record to call for interference in this petition. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC-K:2562-DB RP No. 200015 of 2025 3. Insofar as the contention that the appellant has not filed any objections to the residential certificate of the review petitioner, definitely the authority will look into the same and if no such objections, they will take appropriate action as directed by this Court. Accordingly, review petition is disposed of. Sd/- (K NATARAJAN) JUDGE Sd/- (VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) JUDGE MSR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 25 CT: PS