HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 12281 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and perused the record. 2. The present petition has been filed challenging an order passed by the trial court granting ex-parte injunction against the petitioner. 3. The petitioner has an alternative remedy of filing an application under Order 39 Rule 4 C.P.C. as well as appeal against the order impugned. 4. Since the petitioner has an alternative remedy, I am not inclined to entertain the instant petition. 5. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to avail the remedy as available to him under law. 6. Certified copy of the orders, if any, be returned to learned counsel for the petitioner after retaining photo copy of the same. October 7, 2025 Ved Prakash Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Akhilesh Kumar, Deepak Kumar Jaiswal Counsel for Respondent(s) : (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Gaurav Gupta And Another .....Petitioner(s) Kailash And 8 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad