[2025:RJ-JP:12757] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3431/2025 Rajendra Kumar Meena @ Rajesh S/o Shri Ramjilal Meena, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Khatalya Ki Dhani, Tan Khoh Dariba, P.s. Tahla, District Alwar (At Present Confined In Central Jail Alwar). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mohar Pal Meena For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shriram Dhakad, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 20/03/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.5/2025 registered at Police Station Tahla, District Alwar (Raj.) for the offence punishable under Section 307 of BNS (corresponding to Section 382 of IPC). 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Counsel submits that petitioner is not named in the FIR. Counsel submits that later on, he has been implicated in this matter on the basis of supplementary statement of the victim. Counsel submits that there is no evidence available on record suggesting that how victim came into knowledge about the involvement of the petitioner. Counsel submits that there are no criminal antecedents of the petitioner. Petitioner is in custody since 23.02.2025 and trial [2025:RJ-JP:12757] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-3431/2025] of the case will take considerable time. Further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, as also the fact that petitioner is not named in the FIR; absence of criminal antecedents of the petitioner; period of custody, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it fit and proper to allow this bail application. 6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner- Rajendra Kumar Meena @ Rajesh S/o Shri Ramjilal Meena shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. The observations made herein above are only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J LALIT MOHAN /194