Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 103780 (MAD)

K.Sankaran and another v. Mr. Rajaraman

CONT P/3807/2024 · 2025-02-17

S Sounthar

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Cont.P.No.3807 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 17.02.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR Contempt Petition No.3807 of 2024 1.K.Sankaran 2.K.Balasubramanian ... Petitioners vs. Rajaraman The Tahsildhar, Kudavasal Taluk, Thiruvarur District. ... Respondent PRAYER: Contempt Petition is filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, to punish the respondent/3rd Respondent for wilful disobedience of the order passed by this Court dated 03.09.2024 made in the above W.P.No.25390 of 2024. For Petitioners : Mr.A.S.Bhuvaneswaran For Respondent : Mr.S.J.Mohamed Sathik Government Advocate O R D E R When the contempt petition is taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondent produced the order passed by the respondent herein dated 10.02.2025 disposing the representation submitted by the petitioner. 1/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont.P.No.3807 of 2024 S.SOUNTHAR, J. dm 2. This Court by order dated 03.09.2024 directed the respondent herein/3rd respondent therein to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 15.07.2024 and pass final orders on its own merits. 3. In view of the compliance of the said direction by the respondent herein/3rd respondent therein, no further orders are necessary in this contempt petition and accordingly, the Contempt Petition is closed. 4. If the petitioner is aggrieved by the order passed by the respondent/3rd respondent in writ petition, it is for him to work out his remedy in the manner known to law. 17.02.2025 Index : Yes/No Speaking order:Yes/No Neutral Citation:Yes/No dm Contempt Petition No.3807 of 2024 2/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis