IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 4611 of 2025 Date of Decision: 08.04.2025 _______________________________________________________ Ashutosh Awasthi …….Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & others … Respondents ______________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Surinder Saklani, Advocate. For the Respondent: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Rajan Kahol, Mr. Vishal Panwar and Mr. B.C.Verma, Additional Advocate Generals and Mr. Ravi Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General. _______________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral): While placing on record communication dated 07.04.2025, issued under the signatures of Director of Industries, Himachal Pradesh, learned Additional Advocate General states that impugned transfer order of the petitioner has been cancelled and as such, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the present proceedings. 2. After having perused the aforesaid communication as well as copy of office order dated 05.04.2025, learned counsel for the petitioner states that on account of cancellation of transfer order, 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 nothing remains to be adjudicated in the present petition and as such, same may be disposed of. 3. In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of as having rendered infructuous. Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of. (Sandeep Sharma), Judge April 08, 2025 (shankar)