Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10377 (GAU)

PANKAJ KUMAR SHARMA v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS

WP(C)/2605/2022 · 2025-08-27

Sanjay Kumar Medhi

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010072212022 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/2605/2022 PANKAJ KUMAR SHARMA S/O- LATE HERAMBA PRASAD SHARMA, R/O- HOUSE NO. 129, SOUTH SARANIA, ASHRAM ROAD, 3RD BYE LANE, GUWAHATI-781003, KAMRUP(M), ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, GUWAHATI DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, ASSAM, GUWAHATI-781006. 2:THE GUWAHATI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION REP. BY THE COMMISSIONER PANBAZAR GUWAHATI-781001 KAMRUP(M) ASSAM 3:THE GUWAHATI METROPOLITAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN STATFED BUILDING BHANGAGARH GUWAHATI-781005 KAMRUP(M) ASSAM 4:THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER GUWAHATI METROPOLITAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY STATEFED BUILDING BHANGAGARH GUWAHATI-781005 Page No.# 2/3 KAMRUP(M) ASSAM 5:THE ASSOCIATE PLANNER GUWAHATI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION UZANBAZAR GUWAHATI-781001 KAMRUP(M) ASSAM 6:THE TOWN PLANNER GUWAHATI METROPOLITAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY STATEFED BUILDING BHANGAGARH GUWAHATI-781005 KAMRUP(M) ASSAM 7:PRADYUT KUMAR SHARMA HOUSE NO. 19 SOUTH SARANIA ASHRAM ROAD GUWAHATI-781003 KAMRUP(M) ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. K P PATHAK, MR B CHOUDHURY,Mr. A Baruah Advocate for the Respondent : SC, GDD, MS. S D SAIKIA (R7),MR. K P GOGOI (R7),MR. R SARMA (R7),SC, G M D A,SC, GMC BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI ORDER 28.08.2025 Shri B. Das, learned counsel has submitted that in spite of best efforts, there is no contact with the petitioner. Also heard Shri J. Handique, learned State Counsel; Ms. H. Baruah, learned Standing Counsel, GMC & GMDA and Shri R. Sarma, learned counsel for the contesting respondent no. 7. Page No.# 3/3 On the last occasion i.e. 20.08.2025, this Court has observed that the petitioner was not in touch with the learned counsel and in case the situation persists on the next date, this Court would pass appropriate orders. It appears that the petitioner is not keen to pursue this case. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. JUDGE Comparing Assistant