Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10375 (CHH)

ANIL VERMA v. SMT. BABY VERMA

CRR/272/2018 · 2025-06-16

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:25088 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRR No. 272 of 2018 Anil Verma S/o Shri Dharam Verma Aged About 37 Years R/o Village Sindhauri Gaurav Path Marg, Post Bemetara, District Bemetara Chhattisgarh, District : Bemetara, Chhattisgarh ... Applicant(s) versus 1 - Smt. Baby Verma W/o Anil Verma Aged About 35 Years R/o Village Sindhauri Gaurav Path Marg, Post Bemetara, District Bemetara Chhattisgarh Currently Residing At Village Kirki, Post Ninva, Police Station Tehsil And District Bemetara Chhattisgarh, District : Bemetara, Chhattisgarh 2 - Prabhat S/o Anil Verma Aged About 13 Years Smt. Baby Verma Is The Legal Guardian Of Respondent No. 2 R/o Village Sindhauri Gaurav Path Marg, Post Bemetara, District Bemetara Chhattisgarh Currently Residing At Village Kirki, Post Ninva, Police Station Tehsil And District Bemetara Chhattisgarh, District : Bemetara, Chhattisgarh 3 - Sonal D/o Anil Verma Aged About 11 Years Smt. Baby Verma Is The Legal Guardian Of Respondent No. 3 R/o Village Sindhauri Gaurav Path Marg, Post Bemetara, District Bemetara Chhattisgarh Currently Residing At Village Kirki, Post Ninva, Police Station Tehsil And District Bemetara Chhattisgarh, District : Bemetara, Chhattisgarh ---- Non-applicant For Applicant : None For Non-applicant : None KUNAL DEWANGAN Digitally signed by KUNAL DEWANGAN 2 Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Order on Board 17.06 .2025 . 1. None appears nor any representation made on behalf of the applicant to press this revision on repeated calls. 2. The present revision petition has been filed by the applicant with the following prayer:- “It is therefore prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be kind enough to quash the order dated 30.01.2018 as bad, illegal, incorrect, inappropriate. This Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to pass such an order as it deems fit looking to the facts and circumstance of the case.” 3. It appears that with the passage of time, the petitioner has lost interest in pursuing this matter. 4. Accordingly, the revision is dismissed on this ground alone. Interim relief if any stands vacated. 5. Let a copy of this order and the original records be transmitted to the trial Court concerned forthwith for necessary information and compliance. Sd- Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice Kunal