HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 12240 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed for following relief: "Issue an order or direction to the Court concern to direct the Court of Civil Judge, (J.D.) Mathura to decide expeditiously within stipulated period the Application 6-C for Temporary Injunction pending in the Original Civil Suit No. 63 of 2024 ("Radha Charan Sharma & Another Versus Hari States & others") pending before the Court of Civil Judge, (J.D) District Mathura. (Annexure No. 1 to this Misc. petition), during the pendency of this present petition before this Hon'ble Court." 3. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that an application for interim injunction (6C Application) is pending since 2024 and the same has not been decided despite several dates have been fixed. He prayed that the same may be decided, expeditiously. 4. In view of above, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ashwini Kumar, Somendra Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : Radha Charan Sharma .....Petitioner(s) Hari States And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) 5. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to the Civil Judge (J.D.) Mathura to consider and decide the interim injunction application (6C Application), in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of twelve weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after ensuring service upon all the concerned parties as well as giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment. October 7, 2025 Ved Prakash A227 No. 12240 of 2025 2 (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad