MINAKSHI CHATURVEDI AND ANOTHER v. THE STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS
WRIA/15126/2025 · 2025-10-06
Saurabh Shyam Shamshery
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 103689 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 103689 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 15126 of 2025 Court No. - 32 HON'BLE SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J.
1. Heard Sri R.K.Ojha, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Sri Shivendu Ojha, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri R.P.Tiwari, learned Standing Counsel.
2. I find merit in the argument of learned Senior Counsel that impugned order has not assigned any reason for not granting approval to the appointment of petitioners, except that there is a ban, without disclosing any details thereof.
3. Learned Standing Counsel submits that fresh order will be passed within a period of four weeks from today and in case there is any legal impediment, same shall be communicated to the petitioners.
4. In the aforesaid circumstances, impugned order dated 13.6.2025 is set- aside and this writ petition is disposed of with above liberty to the respondents. October 7, 2025 SB Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shivendu Ojha, Sneh Pandey, Sr. Advocate Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.) Minakshi Chaturvedi And Another .....Petitioner(s) The State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SANDEEP BHATTACHARYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad