Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 103678 (ALL)

MANISH @ MAX SIR v. State of UP AND 3 OTHERS

BAIL/37957/2024 · 2025-07-23

Samit Gopal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:121827 Court No. - 64 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 37957 of 2024 Applicant :- Manish @ Max Sir Opposite Party :- State Of Up And 3 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Anand Prakash Dubey,Om Prakash Mishra,Satyendra Kumar Mishra,Suraj Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Prashant Kumar Dubey Hon'ble Samit Gopal,J. 1. List revised. No one appears on behalf of the applicant to press this bail application despite the fact that there are four learned counsels appearing on behalf of the applicant. Sri Prashant Kumar Dubey, learned counsel for the first informant and Sri Bade Lal Bind, learned counsel for the State are present. 2. This bail application under Section 439 of Code of Criminal Procedure has been filed by the applicant Manish @ Max Sir, seeking enlargement on bail during trial in connection with Case Crime No.356 of 2023, under Sections 376(a, b), 506 IPC read with Section 5m/6, POCSO Act, P.S. Kankerkheda, District Meerut. 3. This is a second bail application. The first bail application on behalf of the applicant was dismissed for want of prosecution by a coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 29.7.2024 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.51641 of 2023. 4. Learned counsel for the first informant submits that the present bail application has rendered infructuous since the trial in the matter has concluded. 5. Since there is no representation from the side of the applicant, the present bail application is dismissed for want of prosecution. 6. Pending application (s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (Samit Gopal, J.) Order Date :- 24.7.2025 Gaurav Kuls Digitally signed by :- GAURAV KULSHRESTHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad