IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.1714 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-51 Year-2024 Thana- MADHUBANI COMPLAINT CASE District- Madhubani ====================================================== 1. Sone Lal Pandit S/o Khattar Pandit R/o Village- Andharmath, PS- Andhramath, District- Madhubani 2. Bishakha Devi W/o Sone Lal Pandit R/o Village- Andharmath, PS- Andhramath, District- Madhubani 3. Lalu Pandit S/o Sone Lal Pandit R/o Village- Andharmath, PS- Andhramath, District- Madhubani 4. Ravin Pandit S/o Sone Lal Pandit R/o Village- Andharmath, PS- Andhramath, District- Madhubani 5. Ajay Pandit S/o Sone Lal Pandit R/o Village- Andharmath, PS- Andhramath, District- Madhubani 6. Siya Devi W/o Lalu Pandit R/o Village- Andharmath, PS- Andhramath, District- Madhubani 7. Durga Devi W/o Ravin Pandit R/o Village- Andharmath, PS- Andhramath, District- Madhubani ... ... Appellants Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Chhotaki Devi W/o Bantu Sadai R/o Village- Andharmath, PS- Andhramath, District- Madhubani ... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellants : Mr. Ravi Prakash, Advocate Mr. Gagandeo Yadav, Advocate For the State : Mr. Sadanand Paswan, Spl. P.P. For the Informant : Mr. Pramod Kumar Yadav, Advocate Mr. Prashant Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 4 25-11-2025 Heard learned counsel for the appellants, learned Special Public Prosecutor and learned counsel for the complainant/respondent no.2. 2. This appeal is preferred against the order Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.1714 of 2025(4) dt.25-11-2025 2/3 dated 17.03.2025 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, 1st -cum- Special Judge (S.C./S.T.), Madhubani, in connection with Madhubani Complaint Case No.51 of 2024 registered for the offence under sections 147, 148, 323, 354, 379, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code and under sections 3(1)(r) (s), 3(2)(va) of the S.C./S.T. Act., by which the prayer of the appellants for grant of anticipatory bail has been rejected. 3. As per the F.I.R., the appellants kept sand and stones in front of the house of the complainant and blocked the road. When the informant asked them to remove the same, the appellants abused her by saying he caste name and also assaulted her. 4. Learned counsel for the appellants submits that the appellants have clean antecedent and the occurrence has taken place on account a trivial dispute. 5. Learned Special Public Prosecutor for the State and learned counsel for the complainant have opposed the prayer of the appellant for grant of bail. 6. I have considered the submissions of the parties. 7. Considering the fact that the incident has taken place on account of a trivial dispute, this appeal is Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.1714 of 2025(4) dt.25-11-2025 3/3 allowed. Accordingly, the impugned order dated 17.03.2025 is set aside. 8. Let the appellants, in the event of their arrest or surrender within four weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge 1st, -cum- Special Judge, S.C./S.T., Madhubani / concerned Court, in connection with Madhubani Complaint Case No.51 of 2024, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure/482(2) of the BNSS. pawan/- (Sandeep Kumar, J) U t