Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 103668 (MAD)

T.Karuppapillai v. The District Collector

WP/35752/2019 · 2025-01-22

P T Asha

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P.No.35752 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 22.01.2025 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE P.T.ASHA W.P.No.35752 of 2019 W.M.P.Nos.36657 & 36659 of 2019 T.Karuppapillai ...Petitioner Vs 1.The District Collector Villupuram District. Now: The District Collector, Kallakurichi District. Kallakurichi – 606 202. 2.The Tahsildar Kallakurichi Taluk. Kallakurichi 3.P.Ayyandurai ...Respondents PRAYER :- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution ofIndia, pleased to issue Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the impugned dated 28.09.2019 made in Na.Ka. A5 /13512 /2019 passed by the 1st respondent, quash the same and consequently forebear the respondents from interfering with petitioner's to property compromised in S.F.Nos.100/4A1, 4A2, 4B1, 4B2, 5A, 5B, 5C, 5D and 7B, Sadaiyampattu Village, Kallakurichi Taluk and District. 1/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.35752 of 2019 For Petitioner : Mr.N.Manokaran For Respondents : Mr.M.R.Gokul Krishnan Additional Government Pleader (For R1 & R2 ) Mr.B.R.Shankaralingam for R3 ORDER The Writ Petition has been filed for the following reliefs:- To call for the records relating to the impugned order dated 28.09.2019 made in Na.Ka.A5/13512/2019 passed by the 1st respondent, quash the same and consequently forebear the respondents from interfering with petitioner's right to property compromised in S.F.Nos.100/4A1, 4A2, 4B1, 4B2, 5A, 5B, 5C, 5D and 7B, Sadaiyampattu Village, Kallakurichi Taluk and District. 2.Heard the learned counsels on either side and perused the records. Mr.M.R.Gokul Krishnan, the learned Additional Government Pleader takes notice for R1 and R2. 2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.35752 of 2019 3.Without going into the merits of the case a perusal of the impugned order dated 28.09.2019 would clearly indicate that the order is passed without notice to the Writ Petitioner herein. The said impugned order came to be passed pursuant to the orders of this Court in W.P.No.6000 of 2019 which was a Writ Petition that was filed by the third respondent. While disposing of the same, this Court had made it clear that the said representation of the third respondent herein dated 05.02.2019 shall be considered and orders passed after hearing the third respondent and all interested parties if any. The petitioner herein has not been heard in this regard, more particularly when the subject property belongs to the petitioner. Therefore, the impugned order dated 28.09.2019 made in Na.Ka.A5/13512/2019 is set aside and the matter is remitted back to the first respondent for fresh consideration. At this juncture, Mr.Manokaran, the learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has already filed a comprehensive suit in O.S.No.122 of 2019 on the file of the learned First Additional District Munsif, Kallakurichi. The first respondent shall take note of the above while disposing of the representation of the third respondent. 3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.35752 of 2019 4.Accordingly, the Writ Petition is allowed with the above directions. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 21.01.2025 Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No Speaking Order/Non Speaking Order ep 4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.35752 of 2019 P.T.ASHA , J, ep To 1.The District Collector Villupuram District. Now: The District Collector, Kallakurichi District. Kallakurichi – 606 202. 2.The Tahsildar Kallakurichi Taluk. Kallakurichi W.P.No.35752 of 2019 W.M.P.Nos.36657 & 36659 of 2019 22.01.2025 5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis