Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10365 (UTT)

MOHD. SHAHID v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/1943/2021 · 2025-03-26

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPCRL No.1943 of 2021 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. There is no representation for the petitioners. 2. Mr. B.C. Joshi, A.G.A. with Ms. S.B. Dobhal, B.H. for the State. 3. Ms. Nancy Singh, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Shashi Kant Shandilya, Advocate for respondent no.3. 4. Learned counsel for the State made a statement at bar that the writ petition has rendered infructuous, as charge sheet has been submitted in the matter on 17.02.2022. 5. In view of the statement so made by learned counsel for the State, nothing remains to be decided in the present writ petition. 6. Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed as infructuous with a liberty to the petitioners to challenge the charge sheet before appropriate forum. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 26.03.2025 SK