Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 103646 (ALL)

NARENDRA KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

WRIA/15969/2024 · 2025-01-15

Neeraj Tiwari

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:6545 Court No. - 6 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 15969 of 2024 Petitioner :- Narendra Kumar Respondent :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Grijesh Tiwari Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Neeraj Tiwari,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned standing counsel for State- respondents. 2. Present petition has been filed seeking following relief:- "a). Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondent No.2 to pass the appropriate orders on the claim of the petitioner with regard to the posting of the petitioner in the office of D.I.E.T., Pukhrayan, District Kanpur Dehat, forthwith or within stipulated period as fixed by this Hon'ble Court. b). Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding/directing the respondent No.2 to decide the representation dated 03.06.2024 moved by the petitioner with regard to the posting of the petitioner in the office of D.I.E.T., Pukhrayan, District Kanpur Dehat." 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that for redressal of his grievance, petitioner has filed representation dated 03.06.2024 before respondent No.2, but no decision has been taken till date. Lastly, it is submitted that a direction may be issued to respondent No.2 to decide the representation within a stipulated time. 4.Learned Standing Counsel has submitted that petitioner may be directed to file fresh representation before respondent No.2. He further submitted that in case any such representation is filed, the same shall be considered and decided at the earliest. 5. In view of the facts and circumstances of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to move fresh representation along with certified copy of this order before respondent No.2 within two weeks from today. In case any such representation is filed, respondent No.2 is directed to decide the same in accordance with law maximum within a period of six weeks thereafter. 6.It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the case on merits. It is upon respondent No.2 to pass order after considering the relevant Rules as well as facts of the case. Order Date :- 15.1.2025 Amit Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad