VIJAY KUMAR AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS
WRIC/33752/2024 · 2025-07-09
Rohit Ranjan Agarwal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 103645 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 103645 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:110585
Court No. - 34 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 33752 of 2024 Petitioner :- Vijay Kumar And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Aradhana Singh,Ravi Pratap Narayan Singh Counsel for Respondent :- Bhupendra Kumar Tripathi,C.S.C.,Kailash Nath Singh Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J. After some argument, counsel for petitioners has disclosed that he has already preferred Writ-C No. 39543 of 2015. Once the writ petition is pending challenging the order passed on the recall application filed in proceedings under Section 176 of U.P. Z.A. and L.R. Act, fresh writ petition against restoration of recall application is not maintainable. The petitioner has remedy of filing an amendment application in the said writ petition and get his writ petition amended. The second writ petition is not maintainable and the same stands dismissed. Order Date :- 10.7.2025 V.S.Singh Digitally signed by :- VIDYA SAGAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- VIDYA SAGAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad