[2025:JHHC:11918] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.3145 of 2025 ------ Imamuddin Ansari Aged 74 Years, Son of Late Bigan Ansari; R/o Village- Sendha, P.O.- Katahar Kalan, P.S.- Dhurki & District- Garhwa. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Gopal K. Sinha, Advocate Mr. Vaibhav Joshi, Advocate Ms. Priyanka Boby, Advocate Ms. Chanchal Chhaya, Advocate For the State : Mr. Sardhu Mahto, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated-22-04-2025 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Dhurki P.S. Case No.141 of 2024 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 103(1) of the B.N.S., 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner has committed murder of the father of the informant by electrocution. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that there is a longstanding enmity between the parties. It is then submitted that the petitioner earlier instituted Dhurki P.S. Case No.96 of 2019 against the husband of the informant and others and because of that animosity, the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case, even though the death of the deceased was an accidental death and the petitioner was nowhere near the place of occurrence at the time of alleged death of the father of informant by electrocution. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 22.01.2025 as mentioned in para-1 of the instant bail application. It is further submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-5 of the instant bail application. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner also undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or any of the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Addl.P.P. appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM, Nagar Untari, Garhwa in connection with Dhurki P.S. Case No.141 of 2024 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the informant or any of the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Saroj/