130 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-55855-2024 (O&M) Date of decision: 13.02.2025 Sunil Kumar and others ...Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHABIR SINGH SINDHU Present: None for the petitioners. Mr. Mohit Kapoor, Sr. DAG, Punjab. None for respondent No. 2. ****** MAHABIR SINGH SINDHU, J. Present petition has been filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for quashing of FIR No. 235 dated 30.11.2019, under Sections 120-B, 420, 419, 465, 467, 468, 471 of Indian Penal Code, 1860, registered at P.S. Bhikhi, District Mansa and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise dated 30.10.2024 effected between the parties i.e. petitioners and respondent No. 2, qua the petitioners. (2) On previous occasion also, no one had appeared on behalf of respondent No. 2. Today also, position is the same. It appears, prima facie, that this is a partial quashing petition, which is not permissible in view of judgment dated 12.11.2024 of Hon’ble Division Bench of this Court passed in CRM-M- 48043-2023 titled as ‘Rakesh Das Vs. State of Haryana and another’. (3) Since no one has appeared on behalf of the petitioners, it seems that petitioners have lost interest in the matter. (4) Consequently, there is no option except to dismiss the petition for non-prosecution. HARISH KUMAR 2025.02.13 19:28 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-55855-2024 (O&M) -2- (5) Ordered accordingly. (6) It is clarified that the above observations may not be construed as an expression of opinion on the merits of the controversy, in any manner. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed off. 13.02.2025 ( MAHABIR SINGH SINDHU ) Harish Kumar JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No HARISH KUMAR 2025.02.13 19:28 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document