JAYANT SINGH BHADAURIYA v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIA/15085/2025 · 2025-10-06
Vikas Budhwar
Criminal Appealbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 103624 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 103624 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 15085 of 2025 Court No. - 34 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J.
1. Heard Sri Rajiv Kumar Tripathi, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Jai Singh Chandel, learned Standing Counsel, who appears for State- respondents.
2. The case of the writ petitioner is that the writ petitioner was posted as a constable in U.P. Civil Police in the year 1983 and he came to be superannuated on 30.01.2024, however, the writ petitioner was entangled in a criminal case under Section 409 IPC being case crime no. 952 of 2024 which resulted in acquittal by virtue of the order dated 06.12.2024 against which the State preferred Criminal Appeal No. 09 of 2025 which came to be dismissed on 11.06.2025.
3. The grievance of the writ petitioner is that since now nothing remains against the writ petitioner, thus, the writ petitioner is entitled to all pensionery benefits which are legally entitled and admissible.
4. Learned Standing counsel has not objection to the same.
5. Considering the submissions of the rival parties as well as stand taken by them, the writ petition is being disposed off granting liberty to the writ petitioner to prefer a comprehensive representation along with the self- attested copy of the writ petition before the respondent no. 4, Superintendent of Police, Lalitpur who shall on the receipt of the same by 17.10.2025, proceed to decide the claim of the petitioner strictly in accordance with law within a period of two months from the date of presentation of the certified copy of the order. In case, the fourth respondent is of the opinion that the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rajiv Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Jayant Singh Bhadauriya .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
matter is to be decided by some other authorities then the papers shall be transmitted to the same.
6. Needless to point out that the writ petition has been decided without seeking any response from the respondents. Thus, passing of this order may not be construed to an expression that this Court has gone into the merits of the case.
7. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition is disposed off. October 7, 2025 A. Prajapati WRIA No. 15085 of 2025 2 (Vikas Budhwar,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH KUMAR PRAJAPATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad