Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 103620 (ALL)

VINDHYACHAL v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/15083/2025 · 2025-10-06

Saurabh Shyam Shamshery

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 15083 of 2025 Court No. - 32 HON'BLE SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J. 1. Heard Sri H.P. Mishra, learned counsel for petitioner and Sri Rajan Upadhyay, learned counsel for respondents. 2. Petitioner was admittedly retired way back in 2011 and now he has approached this Court to claim leave encashment on basis of certain judgments of Division Bench of this Court as well as Supreme Court. 3. Learned counsel for respondents submits that it may be a case that petitioner may not be entitled for leave encashment on facts. 4. In view of above, before entering into merit of case, this writ petition is disposed of with an observation that claim of petitioner may be considered by respondents and to pass a reasoned order within a period of six weeks from today taking note of judgments of Division Bench of this Court as well as Supreme Court on the issue and in case of any legal impediment, same be communicated to petitioner and for that purpose, petitioner will file a fresh representation disclosing all relevant facts as well as position of law within two weeks. October 7, 2025 N. Sinha Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Haushila Prasad Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Rajan Upadhyay (Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.) Vindhyachal .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- NIRMAL SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad