IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition (T) No.107 of 2024 Date of Decision: 11.03.2025 _______________________________________________________ Narender Kumar & others …….Petitioners Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & others … Respondents ______________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the Petitioners: Mr. R.L.Chaudhary, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Rajan Kahol, Mr. Vishal Panwar and Mr. B.C.Verma, Additional Advocate Generals and Mr. Ravi Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General. _______________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral): Learned counsel representing the petitioners fairly states that judgment sought to be executed in the instant proceedings has been stayed by the Division Bench of this Court and as such, nothing remains to be decided at this stage. 2. In view of the above, learned counsel representing the petitioners is permitted to withdraw the present petition at this stage with liberty to file afresh at appropriate stage. Ordered accordingly. (Sandeep Sharma), Judge March 11,2025 (shankar) 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?