Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010117112025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] MONDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 5836/2025 Between:
1. G MURALI, AGE 56YRS S/O G.GURAVAIAH, R/O D.NO.8-131/1, SRINAGAR COLONY, RAYAL NAGAR, M.R.PALLI, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRI.SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT,
SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. TIRUPATI URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, REP BY ITS VICE- CHAIRMAN OPP SUB REGISTRAR OFFICE(URBAN) TIRUPATI, TIRUPATI DISTRICT.
3. THE ASSISTANT PLANNING OFFICER, TIRUPATI URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY TIRUPATI.
4. THEPIANCHAYAT SECRETARY, VEDANTAPURAM, TIRUPATI RURAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. J RAVI KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S):
2
1. GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN URBAN DEV
2. Karri kalyan Durga Prasad SC FOR TUDA The Court made the following:
3
ORDER:-
The petitioner is aggrieved by the action of the 4th respondent in issuing the impugned proceedings dated 19.02.2025, whereby the 4th respondent has called upon the petitioner to explain, within a period of seven (07) days, why the unauthorized construction should not be removed by the 4th respondent.
2. It is submitted that the said notice is vague and does not specify the extent of the alleged deviation complained of by the petitioner. It is also submitted that thereafter, the 4th respondent directed the petitioner not to take up any further construction, and it has been almost six (06) months, and the petitioner is unable to proceed further with the construction.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner shall construct strictly in accordance with the sanctioned plan, and as long as the petitioner’s construction complies with the sanctioned plan, there shall be no interference from the respondents.
4. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed off. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N 04.08.2025 PNS
4