CRWP-10345 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 117 Kulwinder Singh and another State of Punjab and others Coram : Present: Rajesh Bhardwaj, J. (Oral) 1. the Constitution of India for issuance of direction to respondent nos.2 & 3 to protect life and liberty of the petitioners from the hands of respondent nos.4 to 8, who are harassing and t to save their prestige in the society. 2. petitioners are major and unmarried, however, petitioner no.1 is not of marriageable age. Both th the wishes of private respondents and they apprehend danger from respondent nos.4 to 8 (Annexure P liberty. 3. 345-2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Kulwinder Singh and another Versus Punjab and others Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj Mr. Sukhwinder Singh Dhillon, Advocate, for the petitioners. **** Rajesh Bhardwaj, J. (Oral) The petitioners have filed the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of direction to respondent nos.2 & 3 to protect life and liberty of the petitioners from the hands of respondent nos.4 to , who are harassing and threatening the petitioners to eliminate them in order to save their prestige in the society. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that tioners are major and unmarried, however, petitioner no.1 is not of marriageable age. Both the petitioners are living in live the wishes of private respondents and they apprehend danger from respondent and they have submitted a representation dated (Annexure P-3) to respondent no.2 for granting protect Notice of motion to the official respondents only. - 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-10345-2025 Decided on:23.09.2025 ...Petitioners ...Respondents Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj , Advocate, The petitioners have filed the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of direction to respondent nos.2 & 3 to protect life and liberty of the petitioners from the hands of respondent nos.4 to hreatening the petitioners to eliminate them in order Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that both the tioners are major and unmarried, however, petitioner no.1 is not of are living in live-in relationship against the wishes of private respondents and they apprehend danger from respondent have submitted a representation dated 22.09.2025 3) to respondent no.2 for granting protection to their life and Notice of motion to the official respondents only. ...Petitioners ...Respondents The petitioners have filed the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of direction to respondent nos.2 & 3 to protect life and liberty of the petitioners from the hands of respondent nos.4 to hreatening the petitioners to eliminate them in order both the tioners are major and unmarried, however, petitioner no.1 is not of in relationship against the wishes of private respondents and they apprehend danger from respondent .09.2025 ion to their life and VINOD KUMAR 2025.09.23 18:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-10345 4. respondent-State. 5. value of the do direction to respondent no.2 Muktsar Sahib and grant them protection, if any threat 6. It is clarified that this order shall not be taken to grant immunity to the petitioners from legal action for violation of law, if any, committed by them. This order would not be understood having expressed any by this Court on the validity of their live September 23, 2025 vinod* 345-2025 Mr. J.S. Arora, DAG, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the State. Without entering upon an exercise to evaluate the evidentiary value of the documents placed on the file, I dispose of the petition with a direction to respondent no.2- Senior Superintendent of Police, District Muktsar Sahib, to decide the representation (Annexure P and grant them protection, if any threat to their life and liberty is perceived. It is clarified that this order shall not be taken to grant immunity to the petitioners from legal action for violation of law, if any, committed by them. This order would not be understood having expressed any by this Court on the validity of their live-in relationship. September 23, 2025 Whether Speaking/Reasoned: Whether Reportable: - 2 - Mr. J.S. Arora, DAG, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the Without entering upon an exercise to evaluate the evidentiary cuments placed on the file, I dispose of the petition with a Senior Superintendent of Police, District Sri , to decide the representation (Annexure P-3) of the petitioners to their life and liberty is perceived. It is clarified that this order shall not be taken to grant immunity to the petitioners from legal action for violation of law, if any, committed by them. This order would not be understood having expressed any opinion whatsoever in relationship. (Rajesh Bhardwaj) Judge Whether Speaking/Reasoned: NO/YES NO/YES Mr. J.S. Arora, DAG, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the Without entering upon an exercise to evaluate the evidentiary cuments placed on the file, I dispose of the petition with a Sri 3) of the petitioners It is clarified that this order shall not be taken to grant immunity to the petitioners from legal action for violation of law, if any, committed by them. opinion whatsoever VINOD KUMAR 2025.09.23 18:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document