RAVINDRA KUMAR AND 39 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS
WRIA/15135/2025 · 2025-10-06
Vikas Budhwar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 103577 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 103577 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 15135 of 2025 Court No. - 34 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J.
1. Heard Shri Amit Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the writ petitioners and Shri Pramod Kumar Srivastava, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State. 2. The case of the writ petitioners, who are forty in numbers are that the writ petitioner nos. 1 to 3 are Head Constables and 4 to 40 are Sub Inspectors, who have been appointed in the year 1989 and have rendered 19 years of service. The claim of the writ petitioners is that they are entitled to the benefits which had been accorded to the writ petitioners in Writ Petition No. 44330 of 2012 (Ghanshyam Tiwari & Others Vs. State of U.P. & Others) and the Government Orders so issued thereon. Submission is that they have rendered more than 19 years of service, thus, they are entitled to grant of one additional increment according to the Government Order dated 02.12.2020. 3. Learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel did not dispute the judgement dated 07.09.2012 passed in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 44330 of 2012 (Ghanshyam Tiwari & Others versus State of U.P. & Others) along with similar petition which is Writ A No. 6429 of 2018 (Dinesh Kumar Shukla and 14 Others versus State of U.P. And 6 Others) which was decided on 22.02.2018. The order dated 22.02.2018 has been put under challenge before the Intra Court Appeal under Chapter VIII Rules 5 of this Court and the same has been decided vide judgment and order dated 07.09.2016 wherein the claim of the petitioners were held Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Amit Kumar Pandey, Vidya Nath Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Ravindra Kumar And 39 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)
justified in pursuance to the judgment and order dated 07.09.2012 passed in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 44330 of 2012 (Ghanshyam Tiwari & Others versus State of U.P. & Others). 4. In view of the above, the writ petition stands disposed of directing the respondent no. 3, Deputy Inspector General of Police, Establishment, P.H.Q. Lucknow, to take appropriate decision in the light of the aforesaid intervening facts within a period of two months from the date of production of the certified copy of this order.
October 7, 2025 A. V. Singh WRIA No. 15135 of 2025 2 (Vikas Budhwar,J.) Digitally signed by :- AJAY VIKRAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad