AJAY SINGH AND 16 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS
WRIA/15226/2025 · 2025-10-08
Vikas Budhwar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 103563 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 103563 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 15226 of 2025 Court No. - 34 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J.
1. Heard Sri Shivendra Kumar Gupta, learned counsel for the writ petitioners and Ms. Archana Tyagi, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State. 2. The case of the writ petitioner is that the writ petitioners no. 1 & 2 were appointed as Constable in Civil Police under U.P. Police Department in the year 1989, petitioners no. 3 to 5 were appointed as Constable in Civil Police under U.P. Police Department in the year 1990, petitioners no. 6 to 16 were appointed as Constable in Civil Police under U.P. Police Department in the year 1988 and petitioner no. 17 was appointed as Constable in Civil Police under U.P. Police Department in the year 1987. The petitioners claim that they have completed 19 years satisfactory service and they are entitled to the benefit of one additional increment according to the Government Order so issued on 02.12.2000. 3. Prayer in the present petition is for a direction to the respondent authorities to take into consideration the service period spent by the petitioners while undergoing before they were appointed as Constable for calculating 19 years of service granting one additional increment according to the Government Order. 4. Per contra, learned Standing Counsel did not dispute the judgement dated 07.09.2012 passed in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 44330 of 2012 (Ghanshyam Tiwari & Others versus State of U.P. & Others) along with similar petition which is Writ A No. 6429 of 2018 (Dinesh Kumar Shukla and 14 Others versus State of U.P. And 6 Others) which was decided on
22.02.2018. The order dated 22.02.2018 has been put under challenge before the Intra Court Appeal under Chapter VIII Rules 5 of this Court Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shivendra Kumar Gupta Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Ajay Singh And 16 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)
and the same has been decided vide judgment and order dated 07.09.2016 wherein the claim of the petitioners were held justified in pursuance to the judgment and order dated 07.09.2012 passed in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 44330 of 2012 (Ghanshyam Tiwari & Others versus State of U.P. & Others). 5.
Considering the submission so made across the bar without going into the merits of the matter, the writ petition stands disposed of with a direction to the Deputy Inspector General of Police (Personnel) Establishment, Police Headquarter, Lucknow to decide the claim of the writ petitioner within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of the order. October 9, 2025 Rajesh WRIA No. 15226 of 2025 2 (Vikas Budhwar,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAJESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad