1 2025:CGHC:10624 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 1563 of 2025 1 - Ramvriksh, S/o Ramdhari Aged About 40 Years R/o Namadgiri, Tahsil Pilkha, District Surajpur Chhattisgarh. 2 - Raghuveer Singh S/o Alam Singh Aged About 41 Years R/o Saraswatipur, Tahsil Ramanujnagar, District Surajpur Chhattisgarh. 3 - Dharmsay S/o Thau Ram Aged About 45 Years R/o Khairi, Tahsil Bhaiyathan, District Surajpur Chhattisgarh. 4 - Premnath Singh S/o Uday Singh Aged About 43 Years R/o Sarswatipur, Tahsil Surajpur, District Surajpur Chhattisgarh. 5 - Hulas Ram S/o Majhi Ram Aged About 35 Years R/o Jhansi, Tahsil Premnagar, District Surajpur Chhattisgarh. 6 - Nagendra Singh S/o Dharmsay Singh Aged About 48 Years R/o Batra, Tahsil Bhatganv, District Surajpur Chhattisgarh. 7 - Kailash Kumar Markam S/o Balam Say Aged About 41 Years R/o Rajapur, Tahsil Premnagar, District Surajpur Chhattisgarh. 8 - Dhananjay Kumar Paikra S/o Hirasay Aged About 39 Years R/o Palma, Tahsil Latori, District Surajpur, Chhattisgarh. (Address As Per Present Posting) ... Petitioners versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Chhattisgarh Government Revenue And Disaster Management, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhavan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. Digitally signed by GOPAL SINGH Date: 2025.03.10 19:29:07 +0530 2 2 - Collector Surajpur, District Surajpur Chhattisgarh. 3 - Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Surajpur, District Surajpur Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents (Cause title is taken from Case Information System) For Petitioners : Shri Vaibhav A. Goverdhan, Advocate For State/Respondents : Shri Soumitra Kesharwani, Panel Lawyer Hon’ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 04/03/2025 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, at the outset, submits that the petitioners have already moved a representation before the concerned authorities for considering their case for regularisation. At this stage, the petitioners seek to withdraw this petition with liberty to pursue their representation which has been filed by them before the respondents authorities, to which learned counsel appearing for the State has no objection. 2. Accordingly, the petitioners are directed to pursue their representation and in turn the respondents authorities are directed to decide the said representation and pass appropriate orders in respect of regularisation of the petitioners. 3. It is made clear that no order has been passed on merits of the case. 4. With the aforesaid observations and directions, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) JUDGE Gopal Singh