Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10352 (AP)

Kota Prasanna Kumar, v. Aishwarya Developers.,

CRP/608/2025 · 2025-04-04

R Raghunandan Rao

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010117332025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3206] FRIDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 608/2025 Between: Kota Prasanna Kumar, ...PETITIONER AND Aishwarya Developers ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. V V N NARASIMHAM Counsel for the Respondent: 1. The Court made the following order: The petitioner has moved O.S.No.183 of 2020, before the Learned VII Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Visakhapatnam, against the respondent for a permanent injunction restraining the respondent from interfering with the possession of the petitioner over the suit schedule property. 2. The petitioner, with a view to localize the land and to demonstrate that the respondent does not have any land in the area, had filed I.A.No.837 of 2 RRR, J C.R.P.No.608 of 2025 2023, for appointment of an Advocate Commissioner to inspect the land in question and to prepare a plan. This application is said to have been dismissed by the Trial Court on 15.11.2023. Aggrieved by the said order of dismissal, the petitioner has filed I.A.No.724 of 2024 in I.A.No.837 of 2023, for a review of the order of dismissal, dated 15.11.2023. 3. The petitioner has now approached this Court, by way of the present Civil Revision Petition, contending that his application for review has been kept pending for the past one year and such pendency is causing grave and irrepairable damage to the interests of the petitioner, in as much as, the suit cannot be proceeded further without localisation of the land in question. 4. In view of the fact that the suit itself cannot be finally disposed of, without disposing of I.A.No.724 of 2024, and keeping in view that the suit is of the year 2020, it would be appropriate to dispose of this Civil Revision Petition, with a direction to the Learned VII Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Visakhapatnam, to dispose of I.A.No.724 of 2024, expeditiously and preferably, within a period of six (06) months from the date of receipt of this order. 5. As the present order is only for expedite disposal of an application, the service of notice on the respondents is waived, as it does not cause any damage to his interests. 3 RRR, J C.R.P.No.608 of 2025 6. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J 04.04.2025 MJA 4 RRR, J C.R.P.No.608 of 2025 32 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 608 of 2025 04.04.2025 MJA