HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 15047 of 2025 Court No. - 34 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard Sri Hriday Narayan Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Manish Kumar, learned Standing Counsel, who appears for Respondents. 2. The case of the writ petitioner is that while the writ petitioner was posted as constable, an censor entry came to be passed which was subject matter of challenge in an appeal and a revision came to be dismissed and he approached the High Court wherein the writ petitioner was relegated to approach the U.P. Public Service Tribunal while filing claim Petition No. 501 of 2019 (Bharat Lal v. State of U.P.) which came to be dismissed on the ground that no junior of the writ petitioner has been granted permission as head-constable. 3. Learned counsel for the writ petitioner submits that now fresh exercise has been undertaken for promotion on the post of head constable and the efficacy of the censor entry also stands obliterated since it was dated 12.01.2012, thus, the writ petitioner's representation dated 29.04.2025 be decided for consideration for claim for promotion. 4. To such a submission, learned Standing Counsel has no objection and he gracefully accepts the same. 5. Considering the submissions of the rival parties as well as stand taken by them, the writ petition is being disposed off granting liberty to the writ petitioner to prefer a comprehensive representation along with the self- attested copy of the writ petition before the respondent authorities who shall Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Hriday Narayan Pandey, Rajeshwar Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Bharat Lal .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) on the receipt of the same by 17.10.2025, proceed to decide the claim of the petitioner strictly in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of presentation of the certified copy of the order. 6. Needless to point out that the writ petition has been decided without seeking any response from the respondents. Thus, passing of this order may not be construed to an expression that this Court has gone into the merits of the case. 7. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition is disposed off. October 7, 2025 A. Prajapati WRIA No. 15047 of 2025 2 (Vikas Budhwar,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH KUMAR PRAJAPATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad