KRISHNA MURARI AGARWAL (K.M. AGARWAL ) v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS
A482/4268/2021 · 2025-02-13
Samit Gopal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10348 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10348 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:20710
Court No. - 78 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 4268 of 2021 Applicant :- Krishna Murari Agarwal (K.M. Agarwal ) Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Sudhanshu Kumar,Swapnil Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Sanjay Kumar Yadav Hon'ble Samit Gopal,J.
1. List revised. No one appears on behalf of the applicant to press this application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. despite the fact that there are two learned counsels on behalf of the applicant. Sri Gyan Prakash, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Sri Sanjay Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for the C.B.I and Sri Ajay Singh, learned A.G.A-I for the State are present. 2. The present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicant Krishna Murari Agarwal (K.M. Agarwal) with the prayer to allow this application and set aside the impugned order dated 1.12.2020 passed by learned court of Special Judge, Prevention of Corruption, C.B.I., Ghaziabad in Special Case No. 11 of 2016 (C.B.I. Vs. K.M. Agarwal and others) by which the application for release of the passport of the applicant has been rejected and further to direct the court concerned to release the passport of the applicant no. N4801698 issued by the Passport Officer, Ghaziabad. 3. Even previously on 6.11.2024, there was no representation on behalf of the applicant and following order was passed by this Court:-
"1. List revised. 2. No one appears on behalf of the applicant to press the application u/s482 Cr.P.C., despite the fact that there are two learned counsels appearing in the matter. Sri Sanjay Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for the CBI and Sri Devendra Nath Mishra, leanred counsel for the State are present. 3. In view of the same, as a last opportunity, in the interest of justice, the matter is adjourned for today. 4. List on 17.12.2024."
4. Today again there is no representation on behalf of the applicant. 5. Since there is no representation on behalf of the applicant, the present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is dismissed for want of prosecution. 6. The records do not show passing of any interim order in the matter. 7. Office to communicate this order to trial court concerned within two weeks from today. 8. Pending application (s), if any, shall stand disposed of.
(Samit Gopal, J.) Order Date :- 13.2.2025 Gaurav Kuls Digitally signed by :- GAURAV KULSHRESTHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad