Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10347 (UTT)

ANIL RASTOGI v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/1139/2023 · 2025-03-06

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPCRL No.1139 of 2023 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Gaurav Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners. 2. Mr. B.C. Joshi, learned AGA along with Ms. Sweta Badola Dobhal and Mr. Vipul Painuly, learned Brief Holders for the State. 3. Mr. T.P.S. Takuli, learned counsel for the private respondent. 4. Learned State Counsel made a statement at bar that after investigation, charge-sheet has been filed in the matter on 04.10.2023. 5. This fact is not disputed by learned counsel for the petitioner. 6. In view of the statement made by learned State Counsel, the present criminal writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 06.03.2025 AK