Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10347 (JHR)

UMAR FARUK ALIAS UMAR FARUKH v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./2774/2025 · 2025-06-09

Sri Ananda Sen

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:14788 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.2774 of 2025 ------ 1. Umar Faruk @ Umar Farukh, son of Rajjak Miyan, R/o Village Borwa, P.O. Sabanpur, P.S. Narayanpur, District Jamtara, Jharkhand – 815352. 2. Dukhan Mian @ Dukhan Ansari, son of Gopi Mian, R/o Village Borwa, P.O. Sabanpur, P.S. Narayanpur, District Jamtara, Jharkhand – 815352. 3. Safaul Ansari, son of Mohammad Soyab, R/o Village Borwa, P.O. Sabanpur, P.S. Narayanpur, District Jamtara, Jharkhand – 815352. 4. Sultan Mian @ Sultan Ansari, son of Kayum Ansari, R/o Village Borwa, P.O. Sabanpur, P.S. Narayanpur, District Jamtara, Jharkhand – 815352. 5. Abdul Ansari @ Abdula Ansari, son of Kayum Ansari, R/o Village Borwa, P.O. Sabanpur, P.S. Narayanpur, District Jamtara, Jharkhand – 815352. 6. Furkan Ansari, son of Jhalauddin Mian, R/o Village Borwa, P.O. Sabanpur, P.S. Narayanpur, District Jamtara, Jharkhand – 815352. 7. Fazlu Mian @ Fajalu Mian, son of Hamid Mian, R/o Village Borwa, P.O. Sabanpur, P.S. Narayanpur, District Jamtara, Jharkhand – 815352. … … Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand. … … Opposite Party ------ CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Chandrajit Mukherjee, Advocate. Mr. Preetam Mandal, Advocate For the State : Mr. Pankaj Kumar, A.P.P. ----- 05/ 09.06.2025 Heard the parties. 2. This anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, has been preferred by the petitioners apprehending their arrest, for offences under Sections 126(2), 127(2), 115(2), 117(2), 118(1), 109, 190, 191(2), 191(3), 303(2) and 324(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. 3. Learned A.P.P. representing the State opposes the 2025:JHHC:14788 2 prayer for anticipatory bail. 4. There is nothing to suggest that the petitioners have participated in the entire assault. 5. Considering the fact that the petitioners have not participated in the alleged assault, I am inclined to enlarge these petitioners on anticipatory bail. 6. Accordingly, this Anticipatory Bail Application stands allowed. The petitioners, above named, are directed to surrender before the learned court below within four weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order and on the event of their surrender or arrest, they shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) each, with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamtara, in connection with Narayanpur P.S. Case No.81 of 2024, subject to the condition that one of the bailers should be a close relative of the petitioners and other should be a resident of State of Jharkhand, having sufficient landed property in his name or in the name of his ancestors in which he is having share and to that effect, he has to file an affidavit before the Trial Court indicating his share in the property. (ANANDA SEN, J.) Prashant. Cp-3