Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 103466 (ALL)

C/M BHARTIYA BAL VIDYA MANDIR SOCIETY AND ANOTHER v. State of U.P. AND ANOTHER

WRIC/33605/2024 · 2025-04-01

Saral Srivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:45716 Court No. - 32 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 33605 of 2024 Petitioner :- C/M Bhartiya Bal Vidya Mandir Society And Another Respondent :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Jayant Prakash Singh Counsel for Respondent :- Anil Kumar Singh,C.S.C.,Shachindra Kumar Mishra Hon'ble Saral Srivastava,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the respondents. 2. The petitioners by means of the present writ petition have prayed for the following relief:- "I. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the Respondent No.2 to take appropriate decision after due examination, regarding the registration of the annual list of office bearers of the committee of management of the petitioner society regarding year 2024-25, according to Section 4-B (1) and (2) of the Societies Registration Act, 1860 in a stipulated period in accordance with law. II. To award cost to the petition." 3. It appears that during the pendency of the writ petition, one the parties preferred Writ-C No.3347 of 2025 which has been disposed off by this Court vide order dated 06.02.2025. The order dated 06.02.2025 reads as under:- "1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents. 2. The only prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner is that a direction may be issued to the Prescribed Authority/Sub Divisional Officer, Sadar, Moradabad to decide the Reference Case No.22191 of 2024 (Anjeev Sharma and others Vs. C/M Bhartiya Bal Vidya Mandir, Moradabad), under Section 25 (1) of the Societies Registration Act, 1860 within a time bound period. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents states that no useful purpose would be served in keeping the writ petition pending and appropriate direction may be issued to respondent no.2 to consider the grievance of the petitioner. 4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without adverting into the merits of the case and with the consent of the parties, the writ petition is disposed off with a direction to respondent no.2-Prescribed Authority/Sub Divisional Officer, Sadar, Moradabad to decide the Reference Case No.22191 of 2024 (Anjeev Sharma and others Vs. C/M Bhartiya Bal Vidya Mandir, Moradabad), under Section 25 (1) of the Societies Registration Act, 1860 pending before him expeditiously, preferably within a period of two months from the date of production of certified copy of this order without granting any unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties." 4. The present writ petition on the consent of the parties is disposed off in terms of the order of this Court dated 06.02.2025. Order Date :- 2.4.2025 SS Digitally signed by :- SUNIL KUMAR SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad