Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 103462 (ALL)

M/S MUKESH ELECTRICALS v. UTTAR PRADESH POWER CORPORATION LIMITED AND 5 OTHERS

WRIC/35015/2025 · 2025-10-06

Saral Srivastava, Sudhanshu Chauhan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 35015 of 2025 Court No. - 40 HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J. HON'BLE SUDHANSHU CHAUHAN, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Krishna Agrawal, learned counsel for the respondent No.1 and Sri Kartikeya Saran, learned counsel for the respondents No.2 to 6. 2. By means of the present writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs: "(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent authorities to pay Rs.23,32,067/- to the petitioner in lieu of work done as per agreements, along with interest thereon for the delayed payment at the rate of 18% per annum within stipulated period of time granted by this Hon'ble Court. (ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to consider and decide the representation dated 28.08.2025 submitted by the petitioner(Annexure No. 8 to the writ petition). (iii) Issue any other writ, order or direction which this Hon'ble court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. (iv) Award the costs of this Writ Petition in favour of the Petitioner." Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Praveen Kumar Singh, Riyajuddin Ansari Counsel for Respondent(s) : Kartikeya Saran, Krishna Agarawal M/S Mukesh Electricals .....Petitioner(s) Uttar Pradesh Power Corporation Limited And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) 3. It is stated that the petitioner has submitted several representation to the respondent No.4 to consider its grievances but the respondent No.4 is not paying any heed to it. 4. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that no useful purpose would be served in keeping the writ petition pending and appropriate direction may be issued to the respondent No.4 to consider the grievance of the petitioner. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and without adverting into the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed off permitting the petitioner to file a fresh representation alongwith certified copy of this order raising all its grievances before the respondent No.4-Superintending Engineer, Electricity Distribution Circle, Baghpat within a period of one month from today. In case, any such representation is filed by the petitioner, the respondent No.4 shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law within a period of two months thereafter from the date he receives the representation. October 7, 2025 SS WRIC No. 35015 of 2025 2 (Sudhanshu Chauhan,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- SUNIL KUMAR SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad