HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 15052 of 2025 Court No. - 34 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard Sri Aishwarya Pratap Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Jitendra Prasad, learned Standing Counsel, who appears for Respondents. 2. The case of the writ petitioner is that he had applied for the recruitment for the post of constable in civil police and he was allotted a registration number and roll number also and he appeared in the examination conducted on 31.08.2024, thereafter documents verification was held on 01.05.2025 and further physical standards test was conducted on 10.05.2025 and he submitted an affidavit on 18.04.2025 disclosing the pendency of old criminal case being Sessions Trial No. 39 of 2006, according to the writ petitioner, the said case has been decided in his favour and there is no order of conviction, the writ petitioner has not been accorded appointment. 3. Prayer in the present petition is for a direction to the respondents to offer appointment to the writ petitioner and consequent joining. 4. Learned Standing Counsel submits that whatever might be, it is for the writ petitioner to take a call and the writ petitioner may approach the fourth respondent, Superintendent of Police, District Ballia while filing a comprehensive representation along with the self-attested copy of the writ petition. 5. To such a submission, learned counsel for the petitioner has no objection and he gracefully accepts the same. 6. Considering the submissions of the rival parties as well as stand taken by Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Aishwarya Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Mithlesh Kumar Yadav .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) them, the writ petition is being disposed off granting liberty to the writ petitioner to prefer a comprehensive representation along with the self- attested copy of the writ petition before the fourth respondent, Superintendent of Police, District Ballia, who shall on the receipt of the same by 17.10.2025, proceed to decide the claim of the petitioner strictly in accordance with law within a period of two months from the date of presentation of the certified copy of the order. In case the fourth respondent is of the opinion that the matter is to be decided by some other authorities then the papers shall be transmitted to the same. 7. Needless to point out that the writ petition has been decided without seeking any response from the respondents. Thus, passing of this order may not be construed to an expression that this Court has gone into the merits of the case. 8. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition is disposed off. October 7, 2025 A. Prajapati WRIA No. 15052 of 2025 2 (Vikas Budhwar,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH KUMAR PRAJAPATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad