IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.57865 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-326 Year-2025 Thana- BIDUPUR District- Vaishali ====================================================== Anand Prakash S/O Rambriksh Singh Resident of Village- Dilawarpur Gowardhan, P.S.- Bidhupur, Dist.- Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== with CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 58700 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-326 Year-2025 Thana- BIDUPUR District- Vaishali ====================================================== Kundan Kumar S/o Vijay Singh R/o Village - Chhoti Marai, P.S- Hajipur, District – Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 57865 of 2025) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arun Kumar Tiwari, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ahmad Ali, APP (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 58700 of 2025) For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Arun Kumar Tiwari, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Ahmad Ali, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 3 20-11-2025 Both the above mentioned cases are being disposed of by a common order. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State. 3. Petitioners seek regular bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 103(1), 61(2) and 3(5) of the BNS and Section 27 of the Arms Act. 4. According to the F.I.R., the informant suspects that these petitioners along with other co-accused persons killed her husband on account of old land dispute. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.57865 of 2025(3) dt.20-11-2025 2/2 5. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that informant is not an eye witness to the alleged occurrence and only suspicion has been raised against these petitioners on account of old land dispute with the deceased. Petitioners are close relatives of the deceased. During course of investigation, no material has come to suggest the active participation of the petitioners in the alleged occurrence. Petitioner, namely, Anand Prakash is in custody since 12.05.2025 and petitioner, namely, Kundan Kumar is in custody since 13.05.2025. 6. Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposed the bail application. 7. Considering the nature of allegation and period of custody, the bail application is allowed. Let the above named petitioners be released on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of J.M., 1st Class, Vaishali, Hajipur in connection with Bidupur P. S. Case No. 326 of 2025. AjayMishra/- (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T