Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
p. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
ABLAPL No. 613 of 2025
1. Baneswar Satpathy
2. Tamina Nasini Satpathy …. Petitioner
Mr. A. Tripathy, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha …. Opposite Party Mr. S. Panigrahi, ASC Mr. K.K. Gaya, Advocate for informant
CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH
Order No.
ORDER 07.03.2025
02.
1. Mr. K.K.Gaya,
learned counsel for the informant entered appearance and filed vakalatnama.
2. The same is taken on record. Registry is requested to reflect the name of the counsel
3. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners,
learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for the informant.
4. The Petitioners are seeking pre-arrest bail in connection with C.T. Case No.2236 of 2024 pending on the file of learned J.M.F.C.-II, Bhubaneswar, arising out of Info City P.S. Case No.607 of 2024 for commission of offences punishable under Sections p. 2 85/103(1)/80/3(5) of BNS read with Section 4 of D.P. Act.
5. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners are in-laws and omnibus allegations have been made only because of their relationship with the deceased and the learned counsel for the petitioners vehemently pleads the ground of alibi.
6. Such submission is refuted by the learned counsel for the State as well as the informant.
7. This Court perused the post mortem report as well as the statements on record. Taking note of the same, this Court is not inclined to entertain the bail application.
8. Accordingly, the ABLAPL stands disposed of.
(V. NARASINGH)
Judge
Manoj