Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 103437 (ALL)

AKARATI LAL v. RAKESH LAL AND ANOTHER

A227/12236/2025 · 2025-10-06

Manish Kumar Nigam

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 12236 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed for following relief: "Issue a writ order or direction to the concerned respondent authority to decide the application under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 along with Civil Suit No. 1291 of 2024 within some specific period pending before Civil Judge, Agra." 3. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that an application under Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 C.P.C. is pending since 2024 and the same has not been decided despite several dates have been fixed. He prayed that the same may be decided, expeditiously. 4. In view of above, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending. 5. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to the Civil Judge (S.D.) Agra to consider and decide the aforesaid appliation, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of twelve weeks from Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anil Kumar Srivastava, Kartikey Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : Akarati Lal .....Petitioner(s) Rakesh Lal And Another .....Respondent(s) the date of production of a certified copy of this order after ensuring service upon all the concerned parties as well as giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment. October 7, 2025 Ved Prakash A227 No. 12236 of 2025 2 (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad