BANARASI LAL v. RAJYA UTTAR PRADESH DWARA PRAMUKH (KHADYA EVAM RASAD) AND 2 OTHERS
WRIC/35001/2025 · 2025-10-06
Arun Kumar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 103427 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 103427 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 35001 of 2025 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR, J.
1. Heard Sri Arvind Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. The present writ petition has been filed challenging the order of District Supply Officer, Varanasi dated 16.7.2025, whereby licence of fair price shop of the petitioner has been cancelled.
3. Learned Standing Counsel raises a preliminary objection that in view of clause 13 of the U.P. Essential Commodities (Regulation of Sale and Distribution Control) Order, 2016, the petitioner has remedy of filing an appeal against the order impugned before the Divisional Commissioner.
4. In view of the aforesaid facts, the present writ petition is disposed of permitting the petitioner to approach the Divisional Commissioner by filing an appeal. October 7, 2025 Anil Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Arvind Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Arun Kumar,J.) Banarasi Lal .....Petitioner(s) Rajya Uttar Pradesh Dwara Pramukh (Khadya Evam Rasad) And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANIL KUMAR PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad