IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA Ex. Pet No.105 of 2024 and connected matters. Decided on: 17.09.2025 _________________________________________________________________ 1. Ex. Pet No.105 of 2024 Mohit Lath and Ors ....Petitioners Versus State of H.P. and Ors. …Respondents _________________________________________________________________ 2. Ex. Pet No.149 of 2024 Raman Kumar and Ors ....Petitioners Versus State of H.P. and Ors. …Respondents _________________________________________________________________ 3. Ex. Pet No.152 of 2024 Rahul Kumar and Ors ....Petitioners Versus State of H.P. and Ors. …Respondents _________________________________________________________________ 4. Ex. Pet No.159 of 2024 Akash Walia ....Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and Ors. …Respondents _________________________________________________________________ 5. Ex. Pet No.432 of 2024 Pankaj and Ors ....Petitioners Versus State of H.P. and Ors. …Respondents _________________________________________________________________ - 2 - 6. Ex. Pet No.433 of 2024 Rahul Kumar and Anr ....Petitioners Versus State of H.P. and Ors. …Respondents _________________________________________________________________ 7. Ex. Pet No.434 of 2024 Vijay Kumar and Ors ....Petitioners Versus State of H.P. and Ors. …Respondents _________________________________________________________________ 8. Ex. Pet No.436 of 2024 Shashi Pal ....Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and Ors. …Respondents _________________________________________________________________ Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua 1 Whether approved for reporting? _________________________________________________________________ For the petitioners: Mr. Onkar Jairath and Mr. M.A.Safee, Advocates for the petitioners in the respective petitions. For the respondents: Mr. Sikandar Bhushan, Deputy Advocate General for the respondent- State. Ms. Vijay Bharti, Advocate vice Mr. Arush Matlotia, Advocate, for respondent No.3 in Ex. Pet No.432 of 2024. 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes - 3 - Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Admittedly, the Judgment sought to be executed has been stayed by the Hon’ble Apex Court vide order dated 04.10.2024, passed in SLP(C) No. 22733 of 2024 (State of Himachal Pradesh and Ors Vs. Mohit Lath). 2. In view of the order passed by the Hon’ble Apex Court, staying the judgment sought to be enforced in these execution petitions, these execution petitions are disposed of at this stage, with liberty reserved to the petitioners to seek appropriate remedy for the redressal of their grievances at an appropriate stage, in accordance with law. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also to stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge September 17, 2025 R.Atal