167 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA LOVEPREET KAUR KAP SINHA, IAS AND ORS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present: Mr. Loveneet Thakur, Advocate and Mr. Simranjit Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Athar Ahmed, D Mr. Saurabh Chawla, Advocate for Mr. Nitin Kaushal, Advocate HARKESH MANUJA Learned State counsel on instructions from Mr. (Clerk), Research and Medical Education, Punjab submits that the petitioner has been given the appointment fixed in terms of Writ Court order by granting her the notional benefits within a period of one week from today. In view of the aforesaid undertaking, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the present Dismissed as not pressed. Rul However, aforementioned period, as per the undertaking, the petitioner would be at liberty to seek revival the erring/concerned Officer would be lia Rs.50,000/- as costs from his/her own pocket in favour of the petitioner towards litigation expenses, immediately, i.e. on the first date of listing of revival application. 23.01.2025 Tejwinder IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: LOVEPREET KAUR Versus KAP SINHA, IAS AND ORS HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Mr. Loveneet Thakur, Advocate and Mr. Simranjit Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Athar Ahmed, DAG, Punjab. Mr. Saurabh Chawla, Advocate for Mr. Nitin Kaushal, Advocate for respondent No.2. **** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) Learned State counsel on instructions from Mr. (Clerk), Research and Medical Education, Punjab submits that the petitioner has been given the appointment in terms of Writ Court order by granting her the notional benefits a period of one week from today. In view of the aforesaid undertaking, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the present petition. Dismissed as not pressed. Rule discharged. However, in case the needful is not done within the aforementioned period, as per the undertaking, the petitioner would be at liberty to seek revival of the contempt petition the erring/concerned Officer would be liable to pay additional sum of as costs from his/her own pocket in favour of the petitioner towards litigation expenses, immediately, i.e. on the first date of listing of revival application. Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-4429-2024 Date of Decision: January 23, 2025 ........Petitioner ........Respondents HARKESH MANUJA Mr. Loveneet Thakur, Advocate and Mr. Simranjit Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. AG, Punjab. Mr. Saurabh Chawla, Advocate for for respondent No.2. Learned State counsel on instructions from Mr. Brij Lal (Clerk), Research and Medical Education, Punjab submits that the and her seniority shall be re- in terms of Writ Court order by granting her the notional benefits In view of the aforesaid undertaking, learned counsel for the petition. in case the needful is not done within the aforementioned period, as per the undertaking, the petitioner would be of the contempt petition and in that eventuality, ble to pay additional sum of as costs from his/her own pocket in favour of the petitioner towards litigation expenses, immediately, i.e. on the first date of listing (HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Yes/No 2024 January 23, 2025 Brij Lal (Clerk), Research and Medical Education, Punjab submits that the - in terms of Writ Court order by granting her the notional benefits In view of the aforesaid undertaking, learned counsel for the in case the needful is not done within the aforementioned period, as per the undertaking, the petitioner would be and in that eventuality, ble to pay additional sum of as costs from his/her own pocket in favour of the petitioner towards litigation expenses, immediately, i.e. on the first date of listing TEJWINDER SINGH 2025.01.24 14:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document